4. An experiment

 

How to produce squeezed light


There is a variety of methods to produce squeezed light ranging from electronically driven noise supression in laser diodes (ref. 19) to employment of cold atoms (ref. 20) or even mechanical devices (ref. 21). Probably the most popular and so far most successful one is the so called parametric downconversion in the branch of nonlinear optics (ref.8,11). The present record of 12.3 dB noise suppression has been achieved by this method (ref. 23). Let us look more closely at this specific form of the generation process of nonclassical states of the light field, which was also used to generate the data shown in the previous chapter. We overlap a coherent state of very small amplitude (the signal input) within a nonlinear crystal with a light wave of twice its frequency (the pump wave). Due to the polarizability of the crystal, the pump wave will induce a periodic change in the medium of propagation of the signal wave.
 



 


The effect on the signal wave is very much dependent on its relative phase with respect to the pump wave. Experimentally this phase is controlled by a mirror mounted on a piezoelectric tranducer in the beam path of the signal wave. If the signal wave is in phase with the pump wave, it gets amplified, if it is out of phase, it gets deamplified. This behaviour is best visualized in phase space. The light field's state is depicted by its uncertainty area in phase space, which is just the contour (a horizontal cut) of its Wigner function. The action of the pump wave in the nonlinear medium (mathematically denoted as the squeezing operator) is a distortion of the phase space along hyperbolic lines. In the picture below the purple circles indicate the coherent input states out of which the squeezed output states (red)  emerge. The phase angle of the input states in these coordinates is given by the relative phase angle between pump and signal wave. If the input state and the laser pump wave are in phase, the amplitude of the input signal will be increased leading thus to a disproportional increase in amplitude noise as well. If the input state and the laser pump wave are out of phase, the amplitude of the input signal will be decreased leading thus to a disproportional decrease in amplitude noise but an unavoidable increase in phase noise as well. Thus it can be seen how all kinds of squeezed states can be generated by altering the phase or the ampitude of the input state.
 


 

 

The first experiments of this kind were performed by Wu and Kimble (ref.8). The first squeezing experiments in general by Slusher et al.(ref.7) (see also the book of Walls/Milburn(ref.6)).
 

How were the measurements performed


The crucial technique that has been employed for the measurements shown above, is the technique of homodyne detection. Here a weak signal beam (the squeezed or coherent light wave) is overlapped with a strong coherent local oscillator of the same optical frequency at a 50/50 beam splitter. The fields emerging from the beam splitter are the sum and the difference of the two input waves. Subtracting the photocurrents of two detectors at the beam splitter output ports yields a current directly proportional to the signal wave (ref. 10). By this method the noise at the high frequency of the signal waves natural oscillation is mixed down to an electronically accessible RF range. The following picture depicts this detection scheme:


 

Scheme of the complete setup. The classical noise of the Nd:YAG-Laser is first removed by the modecleaning cavity. Then the main part is frequency doubled in the hemilithic cavity in the upper right corner (SHG, red to green). The signal beam is split off after the mode cleaning cavity and is first electrooptically modulated (EOM) and then injected into the optical parametric amplifier (OPA). The signal is amplified or deamplified depending on the relative phase with the strong green pump beam, with an according change in its quantum noise. The remaining green light is removed and finally the preparated signal beam enters the homodyne detector and is electrically analyzed by a very fast self built online data evaluation system, part of which is shown in the Java-Animation.

 

Main part of the actual setup in the laboratory (not seen: The filter cavity and all of the electronics

 

Detail of the actual setup in the lab: The oven with the heated monolithic OPA-crystal

 

Fotograph of the OPO-crystal

 

The OPO above threshold


Measured data of the classical OPO-output. When the pump power (green) reaches the threshold of 28 mW the OPO starts to oscillate. Its power increases continually, but its efficiency reaches a maximum at 112 mW (four times the threshold). To my knowledge the 82% efficiency reached are still the world record of continuous wave frequency tunable external cavity optical parametric oscillation. The quantum mechanical measurement regime is below threshold, when there is "no" light emitted in classical theory (just random photon pairs) (ref 21).

The very exciting theoretical prediction of the OPO behaviour just at its threshold is that it "doesn't know" at which point to begin its oscillation. It has to be in phase with the pump wave, but since the pump wave carries twice the frequency, there is an ambiguity in the phase, where. This ambiguity is called "optical bistability". The plot of the electric field amplitudes of the pump (x-axis) and the output (y-axis) reveals, exactly at threshold the output-field can "decide" to swing upwards or downwards thus exhibiting 180 phase difference.

Left: The beat signal of the OPO-output just above threshold with a stable laser reveals exactly the expected behaviour: every now and then phase jumps of 180 occur. The OPO can oscillate both ways. The rapid oscillation in the middle of the plot is due to the flyback of the piezo, scanning the light's relative phase.
Right: The corresponding measured laser noise at three stages just below, at and above threshold. First very strong 23 dB anti-squeezing can be seen, then at threshold the main field amplitudes are in the characteristic sine form, but change rapidly between the two opposite phases, at last above threshold the OPO has "chosen" its phase and the resulting output is a coherent state. It should be mentioned that this astonishing (classical) behaviour, strong squeezing below and bistability above threshold has been demonstrated very nicely for mechanical oscillators as can be seen in ref 16.

 

The author in a desperate attempt to produce thermal light

 

bar